A microapp is an app that is highly focused on performing just one task and doing it well. Learn what they are and how you can begin using them.
Although you may see more articles on microapps popping up recently, the term and development strategy has been around for some time. The first search result for microapps was an article on 'Micro Apps' from Forbes in 2015. The author even predicted that soon they may even be commonly referred to with the single word: microapp. Modern-day Nostradamus, I tell ya. So, what is a microapp?
A microapp is an app that is highly focused on performing just one task. In software engineering terms, this is akin to the single responsibility principle which states that, "a class should have one and only one reason to change." In other words, it only has one job and it, hopefully, does it well. Instead of having an app that has every task an employee can do (e.g. report time off, submit expenses, choose benefits, search employee directory, upload shared resources, etc.) there are microapps that handle each of those tasks specifically.
As consumers, we've been using microapps for a while: the flight search box in Google, calendar alerts on desktop, WeChat, and so many more. Yet, you may not know much about what they are. To save you some time, here are the 4 top things I've learned about microapps:
- They reduce complexity for developers and users
- Microapps are not the same as microservices but the benefits are
- With microapps, more is less but more is also more (SO deep, I know)
- Creating a microapp is fast and easy
If that's enough info for you, you can make some here. If not, let me tell you a little more about each of these points. If you're not a fan of reading, you can also just listen in on this webinar: What are Microapps–and Why You Should be Using Them.
Reducing Complexity for Developers and Users
Microapps help you breakdown your large, cluttered apps into smaller, consumable apps which benefits both the developers and the users. This strategy lets developers customize the UI and navigation to better suit the one task that a user needs to accomplish. Users are more likely to interact with an application if it is easier and more enjoyable to use. I hate the cognitive energy that's used just to get to the application I need to carry out a task.
Many of your users may not even be using the numerous features in your app but have to take the time to navigate to the one or two they actually need. A one-stop shop may have everything you need, but what section are the batteries in? How far back do you have to go to find them? I would rather just go to the battery drive-thru. As far as I know this doesn't exist, but I wouldn't be mad if it did. All this is to say, make it easy for users to get a task done and they'll do it more. They may even enjoy it too!
Another pain point for developers and users is authentication. For a developer, having to keep track of the chain of permissions for users throughout a complicated app can be truly mind-boggling. Of course a team can have a reference that says which users have what access on which part of the app at what time. As complicated as that is, what about when you have to change a user's permission on the fly? For instance, when an employee leaves a position at a theme park and should no longer be able to order free guest passes. Not that anyone would take advantage of that (if you know someone who is in this position, my email is email@example.com and I LOVE theme parks!). With a microapp you only need to worry about authentication and permissions for the one task that's being accomplished. For a user, this may mean that they only have to give credentials upon opening the app.
When users don't have a clear path to completing a goal, they tend to make more work for more people. Complexity can lead to confusion. For instance, I was trying to find a list of an employees for a team in a company. The directory was a part of an app that had a lot going on and navigating to the directory took some time. Then it was even more confusing once I was in the directory. So, instead, I sent a message to a team manager on Slack, who then sent an email to an HR person, who found the info then sent it back down the chain. After all that, I didn't even end up using the information. All this because I couldn't easily accomplish the task using their application.
There are many cases like this though: sending an email to the support team because a user can't submit a ticket through the app, calling a support center because you can't find something on a company's app, etc. The more straightforward and simple you can make an app the less likely you are to run into these time sucks.
Microapps vs. Microservices
Microservice architecture is a strategy of breaking up an application into services that are lightweight and loosely coupled. This is pretty synonymous with microapps, the main difference being scale and size. The term 'microservices' refer to services used from frontend to backend, usually using an API and/or message-broker software to communicate between all the services. The term 'microapps' usually just refers to the UI layer. With both of these techniques, though, you are pairing down large, complex structures into more focused, more easily managed pieces.
Just like machines and kindergarten plays, the fewer moving parts, the easier it is to manage.
So, with both microapps and microservices you have applications that have less moving parts; your microapp or microservice is only handling one task. Instead of worrying about breaking the billing part of your application when you go to change the data visualizations, you can have each as their own app and only break one (preferably you would break none). This also makes the transition to newer coding strategies or technologies easier. Instead of having to update a huge project all at once, you can just update it piece by piece. If a part of your app needs to be deprecated you don't have to fish through a large application to find everything that may break by removing it. Since it's loosely coupled, you can make a clean cut.
Less is More && More is More
There is good and bad to this strategy. Less is more because you can re-use the pieces of microapps to form different applications. You don't have to re-write the same pieces of a UI, instead you are just configuring the parts you already have. With this strategy you are also giving your users a consistency across many apps so they have familiar UIs and are then easier and more intuitive to use.
The flip side to that coin is that you now have more applications. This is when more is, well, more. If you take apart an application that has five tasks, you now have five apps. The saving grace here, is the likelihood that creating and maintaining those five individual apps is easier than creating and maintaining the one complex app thanks to the atomic design of microapps. It's not likely that you will hear an engineering manager say, "Stop, we have too many working apps that help our users complete their tasks!" In the end, it will come down to user satisfaction and ease of maintenance for the developers.
Fast & Easy to Create
With the microapp structure, since developers will be able to re-use parts of microapps to create other apps, development time will be faster. Developers and engineering hours are usually one of the scarcest resources for a company. Microapp creation lets developers be more impactful and proficient with the time they have. Having a simplified development process gives you time to create the features and changes that users are requesting from your apps. Since creating a microapp is less technical than coding out an application from scratch more people will be able to help develop apps.
Are Microapps for You?
Maybe microapps are just what you were looking for. If so, great. If you still have questions, well, that's great too. Either way, here are some resources to help you on you microapp journey:
- Check out Kinvey Microapps to learn more about microapps and/or get started
- Read this article about Enterprise Micro-Application Architecture
Whichever route you choose, happy coding!
Tara Z. Manicsic is a lifelong student, teacher, and maker.
9 en 10 december 2019 Vergaar nieuwe databronnen en benut analytics en machine learning om de concurrentie een stap voor te blijven. Er wordt gekeken hoe machine learning en advanced analytics technieken zoals tekst-analyse, sentiment analyse,...
Op woensdag 25 en donderdag 26 maart 2020 vindt in het Van der Valk Hotel in Utrecht voor de zevende keer de Data Warehousing & Business Intelligence Summit plaats. Dit onafhankelijke congres wordt wederom georganiseerd door Adept Events, en heeft oo...
8 april 2020Praktisch seminar waarin Sander Hoogendoorn u laat zien hoe u microservices kunt inzetten in uw softwarearchitectuur.Het nieuwste architectuurprincipe microservices lijkt veelbelovend: verkorte time-to-market, schaalbaarheid, autonomie, u...
4 juni 2020Workshop met BPM-specialist Christian Gijsels over business analyse, modelleren en simuleren met de nieuwste release van Sparx Systems' Enterprise Architect, versie 15.Intensieve cursus waarin alle basisfunctionaliteiten van Enterprise Arc...
11 en 12 juni 2020 Praktische tweedaagse workshop met internationaal gerenommeerde spreker Alec Sharp over herkennen, beschrijven en ontwerpen van business processen. De workshop wordt ondersteund met praktijkvoorbeelden en duidelijke, herbruikb...
17 en 18 juni 2020Tweedaagse workshop over probleem-analyse door Adrian Reed.This practical, hands-on workshop by Adrian Reed, focusses on the problem-solving skills that practitioners need in order to collaboratively explore and describe problems, a...